Sunday, April 25, 2010

Ugly Wellington Buildings. Ugliest Alteration


Inspired by the blog "Ugly New Zealand", here are 4 nominations of buildings that peeve me every time I see them. Other nominations invited. I'm doing them as 4 separate blogs

The "Burger King" building, Manners Mall.
First glance shows a beautiful old Bank building.
Terry Serepesos now of Phoenix & T V fame, got consent to build this truly tragic mess on the roof. In an example of literally "pushing the boundary" he then added insult to injury by building, I recall, 1.5 metres forward of his consent. An uproar ensued, abatement notice was served...but it still stands there, a blot on the civic landscape.

Ugly Wellington Buildings. Ugliest Public Building, & Greatest Detraction To Location


Inspired by the blog "Ugly New Zealand", here are 4 nominations of buildings that peeve me every time I see them. Other nominations invited. I'm doing them as 4 separate blogs.
The Von Zeldits Building, Kelburn Parade.
I fume every time I drive through Victoria University Campus.I imagine like all the residents of Kelburn. A bigger pile of rubbish in a neighbourhood is unlikely to be found outside the ex soviet block. I count at least 8 building that have ruined this area. The black joke to me, is the University boasts a "School of Architecture"!

Ugly Wellington buildings. Ugliest Apartments.


Inspired by the blog "Ugly New Zealand", here are 4 nominations of buildings that peeve me every time I see them. Other nominations invited. I'm doing them as 4 seperate blogs.
Kent Apartments, Kent Terrace
There are many contenders for this award. I nominate this because it occupies such a visable spot. To me looks thrown togeathere, The window joinery being the same colour as the building grates.

Ugly Wellington Buildings. Ugliest House


Note: This will be followed by a blog on "Beautiful Wellington Buildings"
Inspired by the blog "Ugly New Zealand", here are 4 nominations of buildings that peeve me every time I see them. Other nominations invited. I'm doing them as 4 seperate blogs.

Ugliest "House"
Athfields thing, Amritsar st, Khandallah.
Note, The property is pretty much everything in front of the harbour, in the forground.
I believe this is called a "house" You may be surprised to know it is owned ( & was "designed" & I use the word reluctantly) by the Architect Ian Athfield. You will be more surprised to know Architects have given it an award!

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

They Are Grumpier About the Sharemaket Than Me!


Comment from what some call " The land of The Brave & the Free"


Wall Street (in particular, the S&P 500) has clearly been on something of a tear lately. But as they say in the fine print in all those ads, past performance is no guarantee of future performance. While the same could be said about real estate, at least with real estate, what you see is what you get.
Lately, there have been a few efforts to take the ratings agencies to task, most recently by California Attorney General Jerry Brown, who is in the midst of a seven month investigation into whether ratings agencies “acted improperly during the credit boom by assigning super-safe, triple-A ratings to mortgage-backed securities that later turned out to be extremely risky and in some cases worthless.”
Did you get that – AAA ratings for something that turned out to be “worthless.” Someone please explain that one to me.
Where does that leave the average person who has learned to become distrustful of the once-seemingly infallible Wall Street system of investing? Real estate, of course.
If you buy an investment-grade property right, you need not lie awake at night wondering if that “triple A” rated “investment” your broker sold you was actually a worthless piece of paper – because you have a performing physical asset that will be around for a long time, one you can touch, feel, and rent for a profit. And even when it’s gone, you still have the land. That’s more than you can say for much of what’s been sold to investors on Wall Street the past few years.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Rents Up, Overcrowding to Rise

Its likely Tax changes to property will reduce the suply of rental property.
Rents will rise not because landlords can increase rent to restore profitability just becaue they want to, but because tenants will have to compete for less homes. It will be messy, because with high land & building costs & unattractive tax changes, the private sector will not build any new rental property for this surplus of tenants.
In fact NZ is facing a housing supply crunch all round.
Sections need to be $50, 000 to $100 000 cheaper, ( ie, basic new 400 m2 section, cheap area, with sevices for $75 000 to $125 000) & true build cost to fall from a true all up cost that really has to be $2200 m2, to say $1500 m2 before this messy situation is averted.

My prediction? Either massive state building again, or steady backdown on tax law.

You will see Tax INCENTIVES on rental property within 5 years! Heard it first here

How Badly The NZSX Has Done.

Property is about to get a tax thump.
So investors will put money in the stock exchange?
I think not.
The Securities Commisin is widly derided. The public, often castegated for an absense of rational decisionmaking, are very astute to put money in property, which is governed by clear , enforced laws. Not The NZ Wild West.
Even after the '87 cock ups, and susequent fiddling, the sharemarket is still an easy place to loose ALL of an investment.

Think about this aweful indictment: In '87 ( at it peak) the Australian sharemarket value was 4.2 times the NZ value. Now it is 33 times.

Dont beat up property Bill, Beat up the Securities Commission!